[SGP - 0004] Runoff Poll for [SGP - 0003] Shimmer Growth Committee as part of the Tangle Ecosystem Association
On 13 December, @dom issued the Phase 2 Poll to his Governance proposal [SGP - 0003] Shimmer Growth Committee as part of the Tangle Ecosystem Association.
This Proposal is hereby referred to as Proposal 1
This Poll has successfully reached the required 100 votes in favor of the Proposal to move it into Phase 3.
On 16 December, @ShimmerMeTimbers submitted a Counter Proposal to the original Proposal..
This Counter Proposal has reached the required 50 votes in favor in a poll to make it eligible.
This Proposal is hereby refered to as Proposal 2
Therefore, the community is now asked to decide in a final Runoff Poll which of the 2 Proposals should move forward into the Final Phase 3 (Firefly vote)
The Poll will run for seven days. Only forum members with Trust Level 1 and above are eligible to vote in the Poll.
To win this Poll, a Proposal must reach the simple majority of votes, and it must get minimum of 100 votes in favor of the Proposal
Poll:
Proposal 1:
[SGP - 0003] Shimmer Growth Committee as part of the Tangle Ecosystem Association
This proposal has gone through an initial proposal, an updated version containing clarifications and implements community feedback, and is now presented to you in this Phase 2 Poll to determine if it should be voted in a Phase 3 Firefly vote amongst all Shimmer token holders.
Simple Summary
We have opened a new world of opportunity with the successful Shimmer launch. Not only was Shimmer received very well by the market - exceeding our initial expectations - but weâve also received significant interest from investors, builders, and essential groups outside of our ecosystem that offers to support Shimmer and be a part of this growing ecosystem.
Shimmerâs full potential will be available with the upcoming launch of the ShimmerEVM. In preparation for that, we want to expedite community efforts around growth, marketing, and adoption efforts by expediting the capital allocation from the Community Treasury. We see a real need to allocate part of the Community ecosystem fund alongside the existing Tangle Ecosystem Association (TEA) treasury to accelerate our ecosystem growth and adoption. Now is the time to be ambitious with Shimmer and ensure we do not miss this unique opportunity.
We ask the community to make a decision on our proposal:
- To elect three community members to join the Tangle Ecosystem Associationâs âShimmer Growth Committeeâ as Community Delegates and to be empowered to allocate the ecosystem fund quickly, effectively, and transparently in a joint effort together with the Tangle Ecosystem Association. Their mandate will be for one year, to be renewed yearly.
- To use the established legal structures of the Tangle Ecosystem Association as the responsible entity for allocating 50% (90,681,025.5 SMR) of the Community Treasury Shimmer tokens. Through the legal structures of TEA, the Shimmer Growth Committee will fund the ecosystem alongside the Tangle Ecosystem Associationsâ efforts and the Community Treasury Committee, which is currently being set up by the community.
For Clarification:
Tangle Ecosystem Association (TEA) - The Swiss entity founded to be the primary entity responsible for ecosystem support for Shimmer and IOTA. This entity has received 10% of the Shimmer supply (181.362.051 SMR) and has the sole purpose of increasing the adoption and growth of the IOTA & Shimmer Ecosystem. The TEA will use its received funding for this purpose.
Community Treasury Grant Committee - An Independent, Community driven, and community-governed Committee currently designed by the Community Governance group that proposes to select five members through Governance decisions currently discussed and proposed in the IOTA Governance Forum. This committee would receive 15% (27.204.307 SMR) of the Shimmer community treasury tokens (10% of the whole Shimmer supply 181.362.051 SMR) and give out grants based on grant applications submitted to this committee.
Shimmer Growth Committee - A Committee that takes care of the Growth and Adoption of Shimmer by allocating Shimmer tokens from the community treasury. We ask the community to let this committee of community delegates and TEA members decide over the use of 50% (90,681,025.5 SMR) of the Tokens. Additionally, the Tangle Ecosystem Association will add to the Growth Committeeâs initiatives.
Abstract
Although Shimmer was a successful launch, we are still far from reaching its full potential. We want to be more ambitious with Shimmer and attract more builders and dApps to join our ecosystem to unlock its full potential.
As shown by some of our recently launched competitors, investing significant capital in the community and ecosystem will reflect positively on the traction and growth of the project. We need to use our shared resources now to maximize our chances of success with Shimmer. We can no longer be held back by doing things slowly. Setting up our community DAO structure will take months, by which time this unique opportunity with Shimmer and our DeFi ecosystem will have faded away.
To avoid this, we should use the existing legal structure of the Tangle Ecosystem Association (TEA) to efficiently and quickly allocate the ecosystem fund and help us achieve our objectives with Shimmer. To ensure the community is actively represented in allocation decisions, we want to involve trusted community delegates through the Shimmer Growth Committee.
Since Shimmer launched successfully, several promising opportunities have been brought to our attention. We believe that we must use these opportunities now to grow the adoption of Shimmer and its technology and advance its positioning in the market. With this proposal, we want to empower the community to take matters into their own hands and fund new initiatives with a part of their treasury tokens.
Now is the time to be bold and push Shimmer to adoption.
Motivation
As a new layer one smart contract network with a fair token distribution and a nascent dApp ecosystem, Shimmer has opened up a new world of opportunity for us. For the first time since IOTAâs inception in 2015, we are now empowered with the necessary tools (smart contracts) and incentives ($SMR, dApp tokens) to create our own success. This unique opportunity offered by Shimmer is still in the early phase, as the network launch was only one month ago. In preparation for the smart contract ShimmerEVM release, we must scale up our efforts to onboard builders and dApps to Shimmer.
Shimmer is perfectly positioned to capitalize on the current market conditions, especially during uncertain times like the ones we currently experience. Shimmer hits all of the correct narratives which excite the market: fixed supply, sustainable tokenomics, parallelized execution through our DAG ledger, multi-chain smart contracts, modular architecture, proven and successful team, large dedicated ecosystem, etc. Most importantly, we finally have the technology to prove it.
Over the last 12 months, weâve already laid the groundwork with Touchpoint to support our ecosystem. Many builders have taken the opportunity to be early and become one of the first DeFi, NFT, or GameFi projects on Shimmer. Undoubtedly, one of our most significant advantages is our strong community, which has already built close to 75 and counting dApps, NFT, and GameFi projects on Shimmer. We, as TEA, are already supporting many of these projects. We will increase our ecosystem support through grant programs, which will relaunch under TEA and the community DAO in the coming weeks.
Grants alone are insufficient to burst outside our bubble to make Shimmer and its ecosystem recognized beyond our existing community. We need to increase our allocation from the ecosystem fund to create the right incentives to onboard new investors, liquidity providers, essential services, infrastructure providers, and users to support Shimmer and the amazing dApps building on it. Incentivizing the right partners is an investment into the broader ecosystem, and we should use the funding made available through the ecosystem fund for this.
We must match our grand ambitions for Shimmer with the correct and timely capital allocation to spur growth, adoption, and onboarding of the right partners. In the end, we cannot build Shimmer alone - we need to have an entire ecosystem of applications, exchanges, and liquidity providers supporting us to be successful.
Now is the time to be ambitious. Instead of hiding, we have to aggressively go into the market by allocating a large part of our ecosystem funding now. This proposal is meant to offer the community an option to distribute the ecosystem fund more quickly without waiting for the DAO structure and legal entities to be set up in the first place. We can use the existing legal structure of TEA and now start to use the ecosystem fund.
We also want to highlight that certain aspects of a growth strategy cannot be executed by a transparent and fully community-driven organization like the Community Treasury committee. Without the additional creation of the Shimmer Growth Committee, we would not be able to do a lot of the very effective growth measures in our reach now.
Community Treasury Action & Inaction
The current community treasury was meant to be set up through a DAO Committee structure. While a handful of community members have done fantastic work in defining the Community Treasury Committee structure, it is essential to highlight that we are still in the very early stages of community & DAO governance. Most importantly, we are still missing a legal structure for the DAO, which takes time to finalize and set up.
The current proposal to the community of spending 15% of the ecosystem fund budget over the next year via a Community Treasury Committee is not enough to enable Shimmerâs full potential. But it is, of course, a reasonable approach for the community to begin their journey as a DAO and an entirely community-driven organization slowly, step by step.
We donât propose to replace these great community-driven efforts. Instead, we suggest setting up a parallel stream that uses the existing TEA infrastructure and expertise of the IOTA Foundationâs professionals, our connections, and partners to expedite allocating the budget to grow the ecosystem more efficiently.
For that reason, in addition to allocating 15% of the budget via the Community Grant Committee, we want to allocate 50% of the budget alongside these fully community-driven efforts through the Shimmer Growth Committee. This ensures we will cover all possible growth opportunities and push Shimmerâs adoption forward.
Specification
The Shimmer Growth Committee
The committee will consist of 5 members, wherein three are voted in by the community and 2 are members of the IOTA Foundation (Christian Saur from the Touchpoint Team and Holger Webel from the Ecosystem Team). A community vote will select the Community members. For the selection, we follow the processes currently undergoing for the Community Grant committee member selection.
The community will initiate a Governance vote selecting 5 Committee members for their Shimmer Community Treasury Committee. One of the members will be chosen as the Lead and work in a full-time position for the Community Treasury to facilitate all activities of the Community Grant program. Four reviewers will be selected as part-time / freelanced committee members that will mainly review grant applications and decide on spending.
We propose that the selected Lead and the 2 Grant reviewer candidates with the highest vote count of this selection process will automatically become the three community delegates sent to sit in the Shimmer Groth Committee. They will therefore sign service provider contracts with the Tangle Ecosystem Association that include Non-Disclosure-Agreements. This ensures that the highest trusted community delegates will have access to the information and proposals in the growth committee and act in the communityâs best interest. By working with the TEA professionals and getting insights into how this industry functions, they will earn valuable experience that will allow them to be more effective in the decisions taken by the Community Treasury Committee later on.
The Shimmer Growth Committee will actively identify high-impact growth proposals and engage in those opportunities with key players in the DLT space. The IOTA Foundation has a dedicated team of professionals with many years of experience who know the industry best. The IOTA Foundation will prepare specific proposals to use the funds committed to the Shimmer Funding Committee, and the committee will decide if we should take these measures.
Proposals and decisions of the Committee cannot always be made public due to contractual agreements that need to be held under NDA with some of these partners or for strategic reasons. Other activities can and will be shared publicly with the community. At the end of each quarter, there will be a transparency report highlighting where and how the budget was allocated. This report will be produced by the five committee members and will include details of all spending that can be disclosed. Spending decisions that fall under NDA may be summarized under general terminology (i.e., âMarketing activitiesâ, et.)
The three community members elected into the committee will be involved in all those decisions but are not allowed to give out information that falls under an NDA.
Committee Setup Process
Firstly, we want the community to select three members who, together with two members from the Tangle Ecosystem Association, will form the âShimmer Growth Committeeâ.
Secondly, we ask the community to allow us to send 90,681,025.5 SMR from the Community Treasury address smr1qrmakyqt5ezm5k9c0sk39gwfavpktxkjmx0jvh9ejxjq6pr6d39egv2mvuc to the Tangle Ecosystem Association and to empower the Shimmer Growth Committee to allocate this funding towards the growth of the ecosystem.
- Every member of the committee will have one vote in every decision.
- The majority decision (3 of 5 votes) decides on the approval or rejection of a proposal.
- The Tangle Ecosystem Association and the Growth Committee itself will bring forward Proposals to the attention of the Growth Committee.
- The Tangle Ecosystem Association has no voting or veto rights on the committee and its capital allocation.
- The Growth committee will discuss all proposals in meetings within the committee.
- Every committee member will sign contracts and NDA agreements with the Tangle Ecosystem Association.
- Community delegates will be compensated for the work in the committee with an hourly rate of 50 USD paid in stablecoin.
- The Growth committee will pay the compensation of the community delegates on an invoice basis from its budget.
- We want this committee to last for at least 12 months from the point of receiving the funds. It can be extended by a governance vote.
- We will redistribute any unused/leftover tokens to the Shimmer community Treasury at the end of this timeframe or aim for an extension through a governance vote.
Tangle Ecosystem Association Budget and use
The Tangle Ecosystem Association has received 10% of the SMR tokens as part of the Shimmer ecosystem fund. TEA, alongside the Shimmer Growth Committee and the Community Treasury Committee, will work on allocating its budget to the ecosystem over the coming months. While a large portion of the tokens will be reserved for the ongoing ecosystem support, partner onboarding, and team expenses, TEA will also start its own grant program and spend part of its own budget on marketing & growth-related expenses.
To provide a rough overview of the budget allocation of TEA:
- Infrastructure and other partnerships (50%)
- Grant Program (10%)
- Incentive Program (20%)
- Marketing & growth (20%)
TEA and its budget allocation differ from the Shimmer Growth Committee in that it will use its token allocation to directly onboard individual partners (e.g., service providers, crypto funds, or important individuals) by running a dedicated grant program or by funding development or research of universities or other research organizations. TEA will also partially fund community initiatives alongside the Growth Committee but with a lower priority than the previously mentioned allocations.
Rationale
The Shimmer Growth Committee idea was born out of the need to establish an efficient and professionally managed growth strategy for Shimmer that uses all available opportunities to position Shimmer in the market and make it successful.
Without the Growth Committee and only the Shimmer Community Grant Committee in place, we cannot enable the full potential of Shimmer. The Community Grant Committee can do many good things through its community-driven and transparent processes. Still, the Growth committee can go far beyond these measures and become one of the critical factors for the growth and adoption of Shimmer in the market.
Having members of the Shimmer Community Grant Committee involved in the Growth Committee will also help them to see the big picture. With this knowledge and the experience they gain in working with the IOTA Foundation Team in the Growth Committee, they can make better decisions in the Community Grant process.
We are confident that the community supports this proposed setup, as already shown by the significant support for the initial proposal and the updated version, which has reached 83% and 87% support by voters in the recent discussion phase.
Implementation
The following measures need to be taken:
- The community decides on the five members of the Shimmer Community Treasury Committee in a Governance vote in Firefly - The application process is defined by the Community Governance Group and the initial selection process has started already
- A final vote can happen as soon as Firefly Shimmer is ready to facilitate Governance votes.
- The elected Committee Lead and the two top-voted reviewers sign contracts with TEA
- Constitutional first Meeting of the Growth committee, where processes will be clarified, can take place
Vote Name, question and answers, and optionally additional information
Question:
- Do you support the setup of the Shimmer Growth Committee as part of the Tangle Ecosystem Association?
Answer 1:
- Yes, i support setting up the Shimmer Growth Committee
Answer 2:
- No
Additional info:
Read the full Proposal [SGP - 0003] âShimmer Growth Committee as part of the Tangle Ecosystem Associationâ in the Governance forum: link to the phase 2 proposal
Participation event of the proposal
{
"name": "[SGP - 0003] Shimmer Growth Committee as part of the Tangle Ecosystem Association"
"milestoneIndexCommence": milestone number when "pre vote" starts,
"milestoneIndexStart": milestone number when "counting starts",
"milestoneIndexEnd": milestone number when "counting ends",
"payload": {
"type": 0,
"questions": [
{
"text": "Do you support the setup of the Shimmer Growth Committee as part of the Tangle Ecosystem Association?",
"answers": [
{
"value": 1,
"text": "Yes, i support setting up the Shimmer Growth Committee",
"additionalInfo": ""
},
{
"value": 2,
"text": "No",
"additionalInfo": "I don't want to implement the proposed change"
}
],
"additionalInfo": ""
}
]
},
"additionalInfo": "Read the full proposal here: Link to the Phase 2 temperature check post in the governance forum."
}
Proposal 2:
Counter Proposal [SGP - 0003] Shimmer Growth Committee as part of the Tangle Ecosystem Association
A more Community Focused Shimmer Growth Committee
This counter proposal is written in accordance with [The Shimmer Governance Framework]
Summary
A lot has changed in the past month or two.
Dominik Schienerâs original proposal to establish a Shimmer Growth Committee still provides a solid foundation for an important initiative and has been well received, but there are a few aspects of the proposal that could benefit the community and Shimmer further with minor alterations.
This counter proposal aims to build upon the original proposal for the Shimmer Growth Committee, but with a less ambiguous and more transparent initiative that utilises only 35% of the community treasury funds and supports a community focused committee comprising of four community members and one IF member.
We ask the community to decide on our proposal to:
- Continue with the creation of the Shimmer Growth Committee as part of the Tangle Ecosystem Association but with four community representatives and one Foundation representative
- To reduce the allocated financial commitment from 50% to 35% of the community treasury funds.
- To follow an open and transparent process to disclose expenditure and resource allocation of community funds.
Overview
With the market in turmoil it is evident the community treasury requires some serious money management, and that optimised value can be achieved with the community funds. With the current proposal, albeit geared towards a quick spend for maximum value, it is somewhat ambiguous in its intentions, very Foundation oriented, and not focused on long-term community benefits.
With the IOTA Foundation receiving 10% of SMR supply under the form of the Tangle Ecosystem Association, it was expressed that these funds would be used towards exchange integrations, marketing, partnerships, and other opportunities, as well as now developer resources. It has also become apparent that 30% of these funds have already been allocated, with Dom sharing the basic IF financial status in Discord as containing only 7% of the Shimmer supply.
With an ever down trending market, long-term stability for the community treasury is of upmost importance, and an allocation of 50% of the token supply that could be hastily distributed could leave the community treasury very little for its long-term survival.
Alongside the financial implications of a 50% allocation, the current proposal is very ambiguous in its presentation and clearly favours an IF led committee that can heavily influence the outcome of the voting and the allocation of community treasury funds towards IF focused goals over community focused ones.
Our concerns with the current proposal are:
It immediately leaves the community treasury with only 35% of funds by the end of the first year.
It puts control of the allocated 50% in the hands of the TEA. Swiss legislation - the board of any Swiss Association have full control over underlying entities, committees, and member votes and decisions.
It puts emphasis on IF influence and control, isolating the community from important decisions, such as marketing targets, goals, and partners â with Bitboy appearing three times in recent months, we canât exactly say current marketing is on point.
There is zero transparency or clarity into the actual targeting, allocation, accountability, and public disclosure of these funds.
The Proposal
The original proposal has merit and can work, but to focus on the interests of the community we propose to keep the premise of the original proposal, but with the following alterations:
-
Reduce the fund allocation to 35% of the community treasury.
50% of community funds are a lot to commit to an ambiguous and unclear initiative, a reduction to 35% would provide the community treasury a remaining 5% of the total Shimmer supply for the sustainability of the initiative as it formulates a structure and long-term financial model over the first year. -
Commit one IF employee and four community members to the committee
This provides more focus on the communityâs priorities and intentions over the foundations, whilst still providing IF expertise and inputs into the committee. -
Follow a clear proposal discussion structure and voting system
Providing transparency on meetings and discussions between the IF representative and the community representatives, with IF and community members issuing proposed expenditures to the committee, followed by discussion and voting, with all meeting minutes recorded, and all decisions publicly released. -
Publish all decisions and expenditures in the public domain.
Create an open section of the Governance forum where all decisions and meeting minutes are published for the community to see. Also open a transparency section on the forum where all expenses are published in the public domain.
Motivation
The longevity of the community funds is of importance to support a sustainable long-term ecosystem for the future of Shimmer and IOTA. This requires the community to manage their allocated funds in a sustainable manner.
As is currently the case, 65% of the entire treasury has been allocated for use in the first 12 months, which does not offer any guaranteed long-term future for the initiative.
Second to this, as the current proposal presents a highly Foundation influenced committee, the actual control of these tokens lays more in the hands of the Foundation, rather than the community.
Dominik Schiener has said the aim of this initiative is to allow the IF to support and provide guidance and advice to the community with committee representatives. This counter proposal presents the opportunity for the IF to continue with this mission and still guide, advise, and support the community with a representative that can bring professional insights and proposals for potential avenues of marketing and other activities, but with the community voice being prominent in the final decision making.
Another concern, which has recently been heavily discussed within the community, is that of transparency. The current proposal does not present any guidelines for disclosure or accountability as to where these funds are being allocated.
To provide the community with a clear view of where the funds are going, it is important to add an accessible and open platform for transparency that the community can regularly observe, to understand where the allocated funds are going. Even with NDAs in place, there are certain levels of transparency that can be implemented without disclosing NDA specifics.
Specification
-
The committee will consist of 5 members, wherein four are voted in by the community and one is a member of the IOTA Foundation (Christian Saur or Holger Webel were proposed in Dominik Schienerâs original proposal). A community vote will select the Community members. For the selection, we will follow the processes currently underway for the Community Grant Committee member selection.
-
We propose the selected community lead and three elected grant reviewers with the highest vote counts in the selection process, alongside one IF representative, become the Shimmer Growth Committee.
-
These members will enter into service provider contracts with the Tangle Ecosystem Association.
The Shimmer Growth Committee will identify high-impact growth proposals and engage in those opportunities with the key players in the DLT space. The IF will prepare specific proposals to use the funds committed to the Shimmer Growth Committee, and the committee will vote on whether to act on these measures. -
All proposals that do not require NDA clearance will be made public, with expenditures to be publicly released without disclosing the protected specifics of these agreements.
The Committee
After the committee has been voted in, the community will permit the transferal of 35% of the current community treasury (~63,476,718 $SMR) to a unique wallet address under the control of the Tangle Ecosystem Association, to be available for the purposes of the Shimmer Growth Committee.
-
Every member of the committee will have one vote on every proposal.
-
A majority consensus (3 of 5 votes) must be achieved to approve or decline a proposal.
-
In the event of absence, or an abstained vote that leads to a tie (2 for, 2 against) the proposal will be declined, requiring a majority 3 out of 4 votes for approval.
-
Both the TEA and the Committee members may present proposals for consideration.
-
The TEA as an entity has ZERO voting or veto rights.
-
The TEA will commit to a contract with the community committee members that ensures they may not make use of or transfer any of the funds from the Shimmer Growth Committee Treasury without a confirmed vote in writing signed by at least three committee members.
-
The Shimmer Growth Committee will discuss all proposals in regularly defined meetings as outlined by, and coordinated by, the committee lead.
-
Every committee member will sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement outlining the specific NDA terms of disclosure pertaining to certain funding proposals.
-
Community delegates will be compensated for their work at a rate of $50 USD an hour with no more than 10 hours a week to be recorded per committee member.
-
The Committee will pay renumerations to community members from the Shimmer Growth Committee funds on a monthly basis via invoice, to be distributed in stable coin.
-
The TEA will pay all compensations for their committee representative out of TEA funds.
-
The initial term for the Shimmer Growth Committee is 12 months, any proposed extension of this period will result in a community vote.
-
Any tokens remaining in the Shimmer Growth Committee Fund at the end of the 12-month period will be immediately redistributed to the Community Treasury Fund.
-
Under no circumstance will the IOTA Foundation or Tangle Ecosystem Association make use of or apply for the use of the Growth Committee funds.
Allocations
The aim of the funding is to support expansion and awareness of the Shimmer ecosystem and to gain further exposure for the Shimmer token and technology.
Primary allocations will focus on:
- Marketing
- Exchange listings
- Public education surrounding shimmer
- Partnerships
- PR
Recording of proposals and expenditure
There are simple transparency processes that can be implemented to ensure all activities are clearly communicated to the community. A simple vote recording system can be shared after each meeting along with any minutes that do not disclose sensitive information.
Information included for transparency:
- Vote number â a unique identifier for the vote in succession to all other votes, starting at V0001 and progressing sequentially.
- Category â the topic of the proposal, such as marketing, promotions, partners, listings, etc.
- Value â the value of the proposal in USD
- For â total number of committee member votes for the proposal
- Against â total number of committee member votes against the proposal
- Outcome â either approved or disapproved
A basic vote record would be added to the public minutes shared in the community governance forum to contain the following (note: none of this transparency information would normally interfere with an NDA agreement):
| Vote number | Category | Value ($USD) | For | Against | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V0001 | Marketing | 50,000 | 3 | 2 | Approved |
| V0002 | Listings | 75,000 | 2 | 3 | Declined |
Rationale
The suggested Shimmer Growth Committee idea was born by Dominik Schiener to support the need of establishing an efficient and professionally managed growth strategy for the Shimmer ecosystem.(current proposal can be found here)
This proposal supports the vision of the original initiative yet builds upon the concept of providing a more community focused initiative that can better support the concerns and interests of the community treasury for long term sustainability.
The counter proposal presented here expands upon the professional establishment and support the IF can provide the community from the TEA, their network, and expertise, whilst also presenting the community with more control and transparency in the decision making for the initiative.
Having members of the community working alongside the IF and observing the ins and outs of the business side of things will still present a great opportunity in developing the community grant committee members with experience that can be used to improve and develop the Community Grant Proposal system.
We are confident the community will support this proposal as it builds upon the original proposal with a more community focused arrangement with long-term vision.
Implementation
The following measures need to be taken:
- The community need to determine the five members of the Community Grant Committee in a vote on Firefly
- The final vote will proceed on the release of Firefly Shimmer that supports Governance Votes
- The elected committee lead, and the three top committee reviewers will sign contracts with the Tangle Ecosystem Association
- Constitutional first meeting of the Shimmer Growth Committee, where processes will be defined
Vote Name, question and answers, and optionally additional information
Name:
Counter Proposal [SGP - 0003] Shimmer Growth Committee as part of the Tangle Ecosystem Association
Question:
Do you support the setup of a more community focused Shimmer Growth Committee as part of the Tangle Ecosystem Association?
Answer 1:
⢠Yes, I support the setup of a more community focused Shimmer Growth CommitteeAnswer 2:
⢠No
Additional info:
-
Read the full proposal (link to the proposal)
-
Read Domâs original proposal [SGP - 0003] Shimmer Growth Committee as part of the Tangle Ecosystem Association (link to the proposal)
Participation event of the proposal
{
"name": "Counter Proposal [SGP - 0003] Shimmer Growth Committee as part of the Tangle Ecosystem Association"
"milestoneIndexCommence": milestone number when "pre vote" starts,
"milestoneIndexStart": milestone number when "counting starts",
"milestoneIndexEnd": milestone number when "counting ends",
"payload": {
"type": 0,
"questions": [
{
"text": " Do you support the setup of a more community focused Shimmer Growth Committee as part of the Tangle Ecosystem Association?",
"answers": [
{
"value": 1,
"text": " Yes, I support the setup of a more community focused Shimmer Growth Committee",
"additionalInfo": ""
},
{
"value": 2,
"text": " No",
"additionalInfo": "I don't want to implement the proposed change"
}
],
"additionalInfo": ""
}
]
},
"additionalInfo": " Read the full proposal (link to the proposal)\\nRead Domâs original proposal [SGP - 0003] Shimmer Growth Committee as part of the Tangle Ecosystem Association (link to Domâs original proposal)"
}