1.) Preferred Display Name and Age (If you do not want to enter your age, enter that you are above 21 years of age, which is the minimum)
I have worked for IOTA Foundation for almost five years. I had to part ways recently because I start pursuing a PhD in a different domain. However, I am still a big proponent of IOTA and try to follow the project as much as I can. On the side, I am also working on a project (very early stages) for IOTA.
- PhD (ongoing) - Computer Science
- MSc - Information Security
- BS - Software Engineering
- Worked at IOTA Foundation for (almost) five years;
- Researcher (part of MS thesis) in blockchain privacy - see publication
Current position: Scientific Researcher at Technichal Univerisity, Berlin.
4.) What experience do you have relevant to this position (grant reviewer, Project manager, etc.)? Please describe
I have worked around IOTA technology for a very long time so I am very familiar with the tech, vision of IOTA. My experience with IOTA and as a researcher / software engineer in general, puts me in a great position to review the future projects, their feasibility and relevance.
5.) Are you a software developer? If yes, please provide info on your skills and proof of the projects you already have built/worked on (Github, languages, certificates, etc.)
6.) Do you have affiliations that may cause a conflict of interest when reviewing applications? The community would like to know particularly if reviewers are involved with projects as a creator, on the board, or employed. Please list any projects or applications you have affiliations to.
*Note: This will in no way prevent you from being elected to the position. It is the opposite. We seek experienced reviewers that are specialists in different industries. The reviewers with affiliations will not be able to review grants within their category; however, they will be great resources and act as subject matter experts.
Yes, recently I have started working on a (browser-based) wallet project & SDK that will be launched and be open sourced in the coming weeks.
7.) Are you willing to sign a legally binding service provider contract and reveal and verify your identity through a KYC process with the legal entity of the Treasury Committee?
Note: KYC is required for this position. If you are unwilling to KYC and sign a service provider contract, you will not be accepted to the Shimmer Community Treasury.
Yes - I am willing to KYC and sign a service provider contract with the Shimmer Community Treasury.
8.) Can you commit 10 hours weekly on average to work as a grant reviewer for the Shimmer community over the next 12 months?
Yes - I am willing and able to commit 10 hrs a week to the Shimmer Community Treasury.
9.) If you are voted in the top 2 reviewers, you may have the option to join the Growth Committee and work with the TEA representatives. In this case, you may be required to work hours over the required 10 hrs per week. Are you able to commit to this if required?
Yes but depends on the number of extra hours.
10.) Are you willing to sign a service provider contract, including an NDA with the Tangle Ecosystem Association, and respect the Non-Disclosure Agreement if selected as a member of the Growth Committee? Breaking the Non-Disclosure Agreement may bring consequences financially and or legally.
Yes - I am willing to sign a service provider contract and Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA). I absolutely will respect all binding effects within such agreement contracts.
11.) Provide any web links or supporting documentation you would like the community to see when assessing you for the Shimmer Community Treasury Grant Reviewer position.
See GitHub contributions to IOTA projects.
12.) What is your long-term vision of the Shimmer Community Treasury? How do you see the Community Treasury affecting the Shimmer & IOTA ecosystem, and what does the Shimmer & IOTA Ecosystem look to you in three years?
As the Shimmer Community Treasury grant reviewer, the aim would be to promote Shimmer network and get more adoption. The best way to go about adoption is to have more people building around the network and thus brinding more value. By being a grant reviewer, I will have a chance to contribute to the decision making process of ensuring that the focus is put to relevant projects.
Working around IOTA for this long, puts me in a very comfortable position to understand where IOTA should head in the coming years. In the coming years, Shimmer needs to have a maturer ecosystem in terms of tools and covered use cases. I understand the important of a strong and active community for continuous adoption of the project and I want to play a role in it with other people.